↓ Skip to main content

Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Economics, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does slow growth lead to rising inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations
Published in
Ecological Economics, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.019
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 53 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 61 26%
Environmental Science 36 15%
Social Sciences 30 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Engineering 9 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 62 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,978,869
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Economics
#541
of 5,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,295
of 446,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Economics
#7
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.