↓ Skip to main content

Defining meal requirements for protein to optimize metabolic roles of amino acids 2–4

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
64 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
78 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
reddit
11 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
389 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defining meal requirements for protein to optimize metabolic roles of amino acids 2–4
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2015
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.114.084053
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dietary protein provides essential amino acids (EAAs) for the synthesis of new proteins plus an array of other metabolic functions; many of these functions are sensitive to postprandial plasma and intracellular amino acid concentrations. Recent research has focused on amino acids as metabolic signals that influence the rate of protein synthesis, inflammation responses, mitochondrial activity, and satiety, exerting their influence through signaling systems including mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), general control nonrepressed 2 (GCN2), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), peptide YY (PYY), serotonin, and insulin. These signals represent meal-based responses to dietary protein. The best characterized of these signals is the leucine-induced activation of mTORC1, which leads to the stimulation of skeletal muscle protein synthesis after ingestion of a meal that contains protein. The response of this metabolic pathway to dietary protein (i.e., meal threshold) declines with advancing age or reduced physical activity. Current dietary recommendations for protein are focused on total daily intake of 0.8 g/kg body weight, but new research suggests daily needs for older adults of ≥1.0 g/kg and identifies anabolic and metabolic benefits to consuming at least 20-30 g protein at a given meal. Resistance exercise appears to increase the efficiency of EAA use for muscle anabolism and to lower the meal threshold for stimulation of protein synthesis. Applying this information to a typical 3-meal-a-day dietary plan results in protein intakes that are well within the guidelines of the Dietary Reference Intakes for acceptable macronutrient intakes. The meal threshold concept for dietary protein emphasizes a need for redistribution of dietary protein for optimum metabolic health.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 389 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 380 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 11%
Researcher 35 9%
Other 27 7%
Other 72 19%
Unknown 119 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 11%
Sports and Recreations 41 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 8%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 131 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 501. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2026.
All research outputs
#65,716
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#249
of 15,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#508
of 306,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#3
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.