↓ Skip to main content

Bridging β‐Cyclodextrin Prevents Self‐Inclusion, Promotes Supramolecular Polymerization, and Promotes Cooperative Interaction with Nucleic Acids

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bridging β‐Cyclodextrin Prevents Self‐Inclusion, Promotes Supramolecular Polymerization, and Promotes Cooperative Interaction with Nucleic Acids
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, May 2018
DOI 10.1002/anie.201802550
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To imitate Nature's ability to form cooperative self-assemblies using entirely artificial molecular tools and to confer them with properties is still a true challenge. Here we show that cyclodextrins bridged with an ammonium linker which bears a hydrophobic substituent efficiently form supramolecular polymers at millimolar concentrations, avoiding the competing self-inclusion and head-to-head processes. Notably, such assembly can occur at micromolecular concentrations in the presence of genomic DNA, resulting in efficient DNA compaction that is reversible upon addition of a competitive guest, and demonstrating their highly cooperative interaction. We finally show that the supramolecular polymer also cooperatively interacts with siRNA and allows its transfection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 26 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Materials Science 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#9,527,210
of 34,376,207 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#26,433
of 61,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,024
of 375,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#379
of 905 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,376,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 905 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.