↓ Skip to main content

The Impact of Discontinuing Contact Precautions for VRE and MRSA on Device-Associated Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Impact of Discontinuing Contact Precautions for VRE and MRSA on Device-Associated Infections
Published in
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), April 2015
DOI 10.1017/ice.2015.99
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The impact of discontinuing contact precautions for patients with MRSA and VRE colonization/infection on device-associated hospital-acquired infection rates at an academic medical center was investigated in this before-and-after study. In the setting of a strong horizontal infection prevention platform, discontinuation of contact precautions had no impact on device-associated hospital-acquired infection rates. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;00(0):1-3.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 11 15%
Other 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,271,979
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#708
of 6,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,366
of 308,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#9
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.