↓ Skip to main content

Synthesis of a phosphapyracene via metal-mediated cyclization: structural and reactivity effects of acenaphthene precursors

Overview of attention for article published in Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthesis of a phosphapyracene via metal-mediated cyclization: structural and reactivity effects of acenaphthene precursors
Published in
Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5dt00520e
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Metal-mediated synthesis of a new heterocycle, 1-phenyl-phosphapyracene (, Ph-PyraPhos), by tandem phosphination/cyclization of peri-substituted 5-bromo-6-chloromethylacenaphthene () was investigated for comparison to Pt-catalyzed formation of 1-phosphaacenaphthenes (, AcePhos) from the analogous naphthalene precursor (). Reaction of PH2Ph with , NaOSiMe3 and a Cu catalyst gave ; a Pt catalyst yielded PHPh(CH2Ar) (, Ar = 5-Br-acenaphthyl). Deprotonation of a complex of this secondary phosphine, [Pt((R,R)-Me-DuPhos)(Ph)(PHPh(CH2Ar))][PF6] (), generated the phosphido intermediate Pt((R,R)-Me-DuPhos)(Ph)(PPhCH2Ar) (), which cyclized to give [Pt((R,R)-Me-DuPhos)(Ph)(Ph-PyraPhos)][PF6] (). Treatment of with silver triflate gave and the cyclometalated phosphine complex [Pt((R,R)-Me-DuPhos)(κ(2)-(P,C)-5-Ph2PCH2-6-C12H8)][PF6] (), which might form via Pt(iv) intermediates. The effects of the added "ace" bridge on structure and reactivity are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 67%
Chemical Engineering 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,310,939
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#9,687
of 24,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,286
of 409,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dalton Transactions: An International Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
#544
of 2,239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.