↓ Skip to main content

Is One Benign Fine Needle Aspiration Enough?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Is One Benign Fine Needle Aspiration Enough?
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2011
DOI 10.1245/s10434-011-2079-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is used to diagnose thyroid nodules, but the follow-up of benign FNA is unclear. We sought to determine whether routine repeat FNAs after initial benign FNA reduces false negatives.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,934,787
of 27,976,776 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3,458
of 8,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,823
of 153,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#25
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,976,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.