↓ Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Pharmacological Clinical Trials in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Comprehensive Review of Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Pharmacological Clinical Trials in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, May 2015
DOI 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000718
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Abdominal pain-predominant functional gastrointestinal disorders (AP-FGIDs) are the most common cause of consultation to pediatric gastroenterology; however, no medications have been approved to treat this group of disorders in children. The Food and Drug Administration have published recommendations for clinical trials on AP-FGIDs in adults but not in children. The lack of methodological guidelines and accepted primary endpoints for clinical trials in children hampers the progress of the field, making the approval of new medications difficult. A necessary first step to determine the feasibility of clinical trials in children and provide recommendations on the best design for future trials is to review the methods, ability to recruit, attrition rate, and results of previous clinical trials. We designed a comprehensive review of pharmacological clinical trials in AP-FGIDs in children focused on study design. Study eligibility was randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of pharmacological interventions compared with that of placebo in children and adolescents with AP-FGIDs. There is no evidence to support the use of most commonly used drugs in children. Only 7 pharmacological RCTs on AP-FGIDs in children were found. Most studies were single center based and had a small sample size. The methods and outcomes were heterogeneous. Primary endpoints varied widely among studies. Many of the RCTs did not show a consistently significant benefit of the drug over placebo in some or all of the outcomes. We found a considerable risk of bias in most studies. None of the studies have considered minimal clinically important differences in their selection of primary endpoints. Few randomized clinical trials have been conducted. Most studies have methodological limitations and small sample size. There is an urgent need for well-designed randomized clinical trials using age-appropriate validated outcome measures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#21,768,402
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#5,260
of 7,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,993
of 307,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition
#48
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.