↓ Skip to main content

BAD Phosphorylation Determines Ovarian Cancer Chemosensitivity and Patient Survival

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
12 patents

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
BAD Phosphorylation Determines Ovarian Cancer Chemosensitivity and Patient Survival
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, October 2011
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0735
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite initial sensitivity to chemotherapy, ovarian cancers (OVCA) often develop drug resistance, which limits patient survival. Using specimens and/or genomic data from 289 patients and a panel of cancer cell lines, we explored genome-wide expression changes that underlie the evolution of OVCA chemoresistance and characterized the BCL2 antagonist of cell death (BAD) apoptosis pathway as a determinant of chemosensitivity and patient survival.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,240,972
of 23,479,361 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,847
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,412
of 134,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#24
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,479,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.