↓ Skip to main content

培養細胞研究資源のマイコプラズマ汚染調査

Overview of attention for article published in TISSUE CULTURE RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
培養細胞研究資源のマイコプラズマ汚染調査
Published in
TISSUE CULTURE RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, November 2007
DOI 10.11418/jtca.26.159
Authors

小原 有弘, 大谷 梓, 小澤 裕, 塩田 節子, 増井 徹, 水澤 博

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,405,754
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from TISSUE CULTURE RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
#3
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,960
of 168,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TISSUE CULTURE RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them