Title |
Testing for clustering at many ranges inflates family-wise error rate (FWE)
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-14-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew Shane Loop, Leslie A McClure |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Professor | 2 | 14% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#573
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,618
of 377,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#15
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.