↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of molecular diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance in tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of molecular diagnostic tests for antibiotic resistance in tuberculosis
Published in
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., May 2015
DOI 10.3310/hta19340
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Kazakhstan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 398 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 17%
Student > Master 58 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 7%
Other 27 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Other 77 19%
Unknown 121 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 152 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,325,059
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#255
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,777
of 307,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.