Heat acclimation (HA) in air confers adaptations that improve exercise capabilities in hot and possibly temperate air. Swimmers may benefit from HA, yet immersion may constrain adaptation. Therefore, we examined whether warm-water swimming constitutes effective HA. In a randomized-crossover study, eight male swimmers swam 60 min/day on 7 days in 33 °C (HA) or 28 °C (CON) water. They performed 20-min distance trials before and after each regime: in 33 °C water (Warm); 28 °C water (Temperate); and cycling in 29 °C air (Terrestrial) following standardized exercise. Rectal temperature (Tre ) rose ∼ 1 °C in HA sessions, and sweat loss averaged 1.4 L/h. After accounting for CON, HA did not confer any clear expansion of plasma volume [1.9% (95% CI: 7.7)], reduction in heart rate during standardized cycling exercise [1 b/min (9)], reduction in Tre during rest [+0.1 °C (0.1)] or exercise, or change in sudomotor function. Only perceived temperature and discomfort tended to improve. Performance was clearly not improved for Warm [+0.3% (1.8)] or Temperate [+0.3% (1.9)], was unclear for Terrestrial [+0.4% (17.7)], and was unrelated to changes in resting plasma volume (r < 0.3). In conclusion, short-term HA using swimming in 33 °C water confers little adaptation and is not ergogenic for warm or temperate conditions.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,574,607
of 27,362,573 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#2,394
of 3,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,318
of 281,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#66
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,362,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
