↓ Skip to main content

Surface plasmon enhanced spectroscopies and time and space resolved methods: general discussion

Overview of attention for article published in Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surface plasmon enhanced spectroscopies and time and space resolved methods: general discussion
Published in
Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5fd90023a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Baumberg, Michael Nielsen, Sergey Bozhevolnyi, Viktor Podolskiy, Thomas Ebbesen, Kaiqiang Lin, Alexei A Kornyshev, Jacob Khurgin, James Hutchison, Katarzyna Matczyszyn, Jino George, Emiliano Cortes, James T Hugall, Adi Salomon, Paul Dawson, Olivier Martin, Santhosh Kotni, F Javier García de Abajo, Michael Flatté, Martin Moskovits, Duncan Graham, Stefan Maier, Masayuki Futamata, Sang-Hyun Oh, Javier Aizpurua, Zachary Schultz, Riccardo Sapienza

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 8%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 35%
Physics and Astronomy 5 19%
Engineering 3 12%
Computer Science 2 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#24,815,998
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society
#1,213
of 1,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,687
of 410,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society
#57
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,971 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.