↓ Skip to main content

Reinforcement of STAT3 activity reprogrammes human embryonic stem cells to naive-like pluripotency

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reinforcement of STAT3 activity reprogrammes human embryonic stem cells to naive-like pluripotency
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms8095
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)/STAT3 signalling is a hallmark of naive pluripotency in rodent pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), whereas fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 and activin/nodal signalling is required to sustain self-renewal of human PSCs in a condition referred to as the primed state. It is unknown why LIF/STAT3 signalling alone fails to sustain pluripotency in human PSCs. Here we show that the forced expression of the hormone-dependent STAT3-ER (ER, ligand-binding domain of the human oestrogen receptor) in combination with 2i/LIF and tamoxifen allows human PSCs to escape from the primed state and enter a state characterized by the activation of STAT3 target genes and long-term self-renewal in FGF2- and feeder-free conditions. These cells acquire growth properties, a gene expression profile and an epigenetic landscape closer to those described in mouse naive PSCs. Together, these results show that temporarily increasing STAT3 activity is sufficient to reprogramme human PSCs to naive-like pluripotent cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 26%
Researcher 34 18%
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 10 5%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 8%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 36 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2026.
All research outputs
#2,346,656
of 29,598,021 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#31,288
of 72,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,853
of 285,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#273
of 776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,598,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72,399 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.