↓ Skip to main content

Kin Affiliation Across the Ovulatory Cycle

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Kin Affiliation Across the Ovulatory Cycle
Published in
Psychological Science, November 2010
DOI 10.1177/0956797610390385
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A commonplace observation in humans is that close genetic relatives tend to avoid one another as sexual partners. Despite the growing psychological research on how antierotic attitudes develop toward relatives, few studies have focused on actual behavior. One prediction, stemming from parental investment theory, is that women should be more vigilant of reproduction-compromising behaviors, such as inbreeding, during times of peak fertility than during times of low fertility. Indeed, females of other species avoid interactions with male kin when fertile-but the corollary behavior in humans has yet to be explored. Here we fill this gap. Using duration and frequency of cell-phone calls, an objective behavioral measure that reflects motivations to interact socially, we show that women selectively avoid interactions with their fathers during peak fertility. Avoidance specifically targeted fathers, which rules out alternative explanations. These data suggest that psychological mechanisms underlying mating psychology regulate sexual avoidance behaviors, and in women they fluctuate according to fertility status.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
United Kingdom 5 4%
Canada 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 112 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 24%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 56%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,907,849
of 32,300,445 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#2,073
of 4,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,060
of 238,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#26
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,300,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 85.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.