↓ Skip to main content

Mouse models of oxidative phosphorylation dysfunction and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Methods, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mouse models of oxidative phosphorylation dysfunction and disease
Published in
Methods, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.09.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) deficiency results in a number of human diseases, affecting at least one in 5000 of the general population. Altering the function of genes by mutations are central to our understanding their function. Prior to the development of gene targeting, this approach was limited to rare spontaneous mutations that resulted in a phenotype. Since its discovery, targeted mutagenesis of the mouse germline has proved to be a powerful approach to understand the in vivo function of genes. Gene targeting has yielded remarkable understanding of the role of several gene products in the OXPHOS system. We provide a "tool box" of mouse models with OXPHOS defects that could be used to answer diverse scientific questions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 4%
United States 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 60 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Researcher 12 17%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,688,404
of 28,832,041 outputs
Outputs from Methods
#879
of 2,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,144
of 114,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,832,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.