↓ Skip to main content

A Network Control Theory Approach to Modeling and Optimal Control of Zoonoses: Case Study of Brucellosis Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Network Control Theory Approach to Modeling and Optimal Control of Zoonoses: Case Study of Brucellosis Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001259
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Developing control policies for zoonotic diseases is challenging, both because of the complex spread dynamics exhibited by these diseases, and because of the need for implementing complex multi-species surveillance and control efforts using limited resources. Mathematical models, and in particular network models, of disease spread are promising as tools for control-policy design, because they can provide comprehensive quantitative representations of disease transmission.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Kenya 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 129 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Student > Master 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2023.
All research outputs
#11,501,518
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#5,930
of 10,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,072
of 184,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#55
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.