You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Holocene history of the North American Monsoon: ‘known knowns’ and ‘known unknowns’ in understanding its spatial and temporal complexity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quaternary Science Reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.004 |
| Authors |
Sarah E. Metcalfe, John A. Barron, Sarah J. Davies |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Jamaica | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 19% |
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 72 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Quaternary Science Reviews
#2,820
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,266
of 277,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quaternary Science Reviews
#37
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.