↓ Skip to main content

Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery
Published in
Anesthesiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000000706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,724,761
of 34,391,611 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#639
of 9,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,944
of 302,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#5
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,391,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.