↓ Skip to main content

Spin crossover with thermal hysteresis: practicalities and lessons learnt

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Society Reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Spin crossover with thermal hysteresis: practicalities and lessons learnt
Published in
Chemical Society Reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c4cs00376d
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The observation of spin crossover with thermal hysteresis loops of more than a few Kelvin remains relatively uncommon and unpredictable, so is a relatively underdeveloped, but important, area of spin crossover, particularly for memory applications. Lessons learnt regarding the origins, and the practicalities of the proper study and reporting, of thermal hysteresis loops are considered and explained, from a synthetic chemists perspective, after a general introduction to the field of spin crossover.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 339 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 23%
Student > Bachelor 58 17%
Student > Master 29 8%
Researcher 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 111 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 188 54%
Physics and Astronomy 18 5%
Materials Science 6 2%
Chemical Engineering 4 1%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 120 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,988,977
of 29,198,692 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Society Reviews
#495
of 4,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,167
of 373,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Society Reviews
#30
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,198,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.