↓ Skip to main content

Banning is not enough: The complexities of oceanic shark management by tuna regional fisheries management organizations

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology and Conservation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Banning is not enough: The complexities of oceanic shark management by tuna regional fisheries management organizations
Published in
Global Ecology and Conservation, July 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.05.003
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Jersey 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 208 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 16%
Student > Master 27 13%
Other 9 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 35%
Environmental Science 60 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 53 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2024.
All research outputs
#659,797
of 32,563,107 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#115
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,047
of 295,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,563,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.