↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of a bilateral 4000–6000 Hz notch as a phenotype for genetic association analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Audiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Feasibility of a bilateral 4000–6000 Hz notch as a phenotype for genetic association analysis
Published in
International Journal of Audiology, May 2015
DOI 10.3109/14992027.2015.1030512
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a worldwide health problem and a growing concern among young people. Although some people appear to be more susceptible to NIHL, genetic association studies lack a specific phenotype. We tested the feasibility of a bilateral 4000-6000 Hz audiometric notch as a phenotype for identifying genetic contributions to hearing loss in young adults. A case-control-control study was conducted to examine selected SNPs in 52 genes previously associated with hearing loss and/or expressed in the cochlea. A notch was defined as a minimum of a 15-dB drop at 4000-6000 Hz from the previous best threshold with a 5-dB 'recovery' at 8000 Hz. Participants were 252 individuals of European descent taken from a population of 640 young adults who are students of classical music. Participants were grouped as No-notch (NN), Unilateral Notch (UN), or Bilateral Notch (BN). The strongest evidence of a genetic association with the 4000-6000 Hz notch was a nonsynonymous SNP variant in the ESRR- gene (rs61742642:C> T, P386S). Carriers of the minor allele accounted for 26% of all bilateral losses. This study indicates that the 4000-6000 Hz bilateral notch is a feasible phenotype for identifying genetic susceptibility to hearing loss.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Psychology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,552,293
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Audiology
#771
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,362
of 280,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Audiology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.