↓ Skip to main content

Strabismus Surgery Reoperation Rates With Adjustable and Conventional Sutures

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Ophthalmology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Strabismus Surgery Reoperation Rates With Adjustable and Conventional Sutures
Published in
American Journal of Ophthalmology, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the association of strabismus surgery reoperation rates with adjustable or conventional sutures. Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting. Review of a large national private insurance database. Adults age 18 to 89 having strabismus surgery between 2007 and 2011. Adjustable versus conventional suture strabismus surgery. Reoperation rate in the first postoperative year. Overall, 526 of 6178 surgical patients had a reoperation (8.5%). Reoperations were performed after 8.1% of adjustable suture surgeries and after 8.6% of conventional suture surgeries (p=0.57). Of the 4357 horizontal muscle surgeries, reoperations were performed after 5.8% of adjustable suture surgeries, and after 7.8% of conventional suture surgeries (p=0.02). Of the 1072 vertical muscle surgeries, reoperations were performed after 15.2% of adjustable suture surgeries, and after 10.4% of conventional suture surgeries (p=0.05). Younger age (18 to 39 years) was associated with a lower reoperation rate (p ≤ 0.02). The significant multivariable predictors of reoperation for horizontal surgery were adjustable sutures (odds ratio, OR 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.91), monocular deviation (OR 0.64), complex surgery (OR 1.63), and unilateral surgery on two horizontal muscles (OR 0.70, all p ≤ 0.01). Adjustable sutures were not significantly associated with reoperation rates after vertical muscle surgery (multivariable OR 1.45, p=0.07). Adjustable sutures were associated with significantly fewer reoperations for horizontal muscle surgery. Adjustable sutures tended to be associated with more reoperations for vertical muscle surgery, but this observation was not statistically significant in the primary analysis after controlling for age.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 18%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#10,408,538
of 32,567,093 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#2,426
of 8,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,139
of 299,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Ophthalmology
#26
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,567,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.