↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Basis of Clinical Pain Modulation

Overview of attention for article published in CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Therapeutic Basis of Clinical Pain Modulation
Published in
CTS: Clinical & Translational Science, May 2015
DOI 10.1111/cts.12282
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Pain is a hallmark of almost all bodily ailments and can be modulated by agents, including analgesics and anesthetics that suppress pain signals in the central nervous system. Defects in the modulatory systems, including the endogenous pain-inhibitory pathways, are a major factor in the initiation and chronicity of pain. Thus, pain modulation is particularly applicable to the practice of medicine. This review summarizes the existing literature on pain modulation. Here, we critically reviewed the literature from PubMed on pain modulation published primarily within the past 5 years in high impact journals. Specifically, we have discussed important anatomical landmarks of pain modulation and outlined the endogenous networks and underlying mechanisms of clinically relevant pain modulatory methods. The Gate Control Theory is briefly presented with discussion on the capacity of pain modulation to cause both hyper- and hypoalgesia. An emphasis has been given to highlight key areas in pain research that, because of unanswered questions or therapeutic potential, merit additional scientific scrutiny. The information presented in this paper would be helpful in developing novel therapies, metrics, and interventions for improved patient management. Clin Trans Sci 2015; Volume #: 1-9.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 313 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 16%
Student > Master 39 12%
Other 20 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Researcher 20 6%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 121 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 7%
Neuroscience 19 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 132 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#10,329,559
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#454
of 1,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,264
of 306,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CTS: Clinical & Translational Science
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.