↓ Skip to main content

Structural Integration, an Alternative Method of Manual Therapy and Sensorimotor Education

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structural Integration, an Alternative Method of Manual Therapy and Sensorimotor Education
Published in
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, October 2011
DOI 10.1089/acm.2010.0258
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objectives of this report are to review the clinical practice of Structural Integration (SI), an alternative method of soft-tissue manipulation and sensorimotor education, and to summarize the evidence to date for mechanism and clinical efficacy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 52 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Psychology 16 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 61 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2025.
All research outputs
#1,436,498
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#321
of 2,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,625
of 189,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#6
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.