↓ Skip to main content

Accessing DNA damage in chromatin: Preparing the chromatin landscape for base excision repair

Overview of attention for article published in DNA Repair, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accessing DNA damage in chromatin: Preparing the chromatin landscape for base excision repair
Published in
DNA Repair, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.04.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

DNA damage in chromatin comes in many forms, including single base lesions that induce base excision repair (BER). We and others have shown that the structural location of DNA lesions within nucleosomes greatly influences their accessibility to repair enzymes. Indeed, a difference in the location of uracil as small as one-half turn of the DNA backbone on the histone surface can result in a 10-fold difference in the time course of its removal in vitro. In addition, the cell has evolved several interdependent processes capable of enhancing the accessibility of excision repair enzymes to DNA lesions in nucleosomes, including post-translational modification of histones, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling and interchange of histone variants in nucleosomes. In this review, we focus on different factors that affect accessibility of BER enzymes to nucleosomal DNA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Bulgaria 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 24%
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 26%
Chemistry 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from DNA Repair
#967
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,511
of 278,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from DNA Repair
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.