↓ Skip to main content

Dihydroceramides: From Bit Players to Lead Actors*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dihydroceramides: From Bit Players to Lead Actors*
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, May 2015
DOI 10.1074/jbc.r115.653204
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sphingolipid synthesis involves a highly conserved biosynthetic pathway that produces ceramides, the fundamental precursors of complex sphingolipids. The final reaction involves the insertion of a double bond into dihydroceramides to generate the more abundant ceramides, which are converted to sphingomyelins and glucosylceramides/gangliosides by the addition of polar head groups. Though ceramides have long been known to mediate cellular stress responses, the dihydroceramides that are transiently produced during de novo sphingolipid synthesis were deemed inert. Evidence published in the last few years suggests that these latter molecules accumulate to a far greater extent in tissues than previously thought. Moreover, they have biological functions that are distinct and non-overlapping with those of the more prevalent ceramides. Roles are being uncovered in autophagy, hypoxia, and cellular proliferation and the lipids are now implicated in the etiology, treatment, or diagnosis of diabetes, cancer, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and neurodegenerative diseases. This mini-review summarizes recent findings on this emerging class of bioactive lipids.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Chemistry 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#9,200,390
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#9,916
of 29,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,254
of 306,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#147
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.