↓ Skip to main content

Ethics guidelines for research with the recently dead

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ethics guidelines for research with the recently dead
Published in
Nature Medicine, November 2005
DOI 10.1038/nm1105-1145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca D Pentz, Cynthia B Cohen, Mark Wicclair, Michael A DeVita, Anne Lederman Flamm, Stuart J Youngner, Ann B Hamric, Mary S McCabe, Jacqueline J Glover, Winona J Kittiko, Kathy Kinlaw, James Keller, Adrienne Asch, John J Kavanagh, Wadih Arap

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Kenya 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 20 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Philosophy 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 24 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,024,302
of 31,983,049 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#5,167
of 11,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,870
of 99,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#11
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,983,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 110.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.