↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Indications for superselective intra-arterial cisplatin infusion and concomitant radiotherapy in cases of hypopharyngeal cancer
Published in
Auris Nasus Larynx, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2015.04.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We retrospectively assessed the indications for superselective intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy (RADPLAT) in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC). Between April 2000 and March 2013, 41 previously untreated patients received superselective intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin (100-120mg/m(2) per week) with simultaneous intravenous infusions of thiosulfate to neutralize cisplatin toxicity and conventional radiotherapy (65-70Gy). During the median follow-up period of 5.5 years, a statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival was noted between patients with N0-1 (n=14) and N2b-3 disease (n=27). One-half of deaths were observed to be the result of distant metastasis. The 5-year local control and overall survival were significantly better in patients with unilateral than in those with bilateral primary tumors. All the patients with T4b disease (n=3) died of disease within 2 years. Indications for RADPLAT in patients with HPC were defined as patients with unilateral tumors staged as T3-4a and N0-1.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Auris Nasus Larynx
#698
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,700
of 279,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Auris Nasus Larynx
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.