↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploring the Cervical Cancer Screening Experiences of Black Lesbian, Bisexual, and Queer Women: The Role of Patient-Provider Communication
Published in
Women & Health, April 2015
DOI 10.1080/03630242.2015.1039182
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Few studies have focused on the health and health care of U.S. black lesbian, bisexual, and queer (LBQ) women. To understand the facilitators of and barriers to cervical cancer screening in this population, we conducted focus group discussions in Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts between November and December 2012. Using purposive sampling methods, we enrolled eighteen black LBQ women who participated in one of four focus groups. Using thematic analysis, we identified patient-provider communication-which consisted of four sub-themes: health care provider communication style and demeanor; heteronormative provider assumptions; heterosexism, racism, and classism; and provider professional and socio-demographic background-as the most salient theme. Participants reported fears and experiences of multiple forms of discrimination and preferred receiving care from providers who were knowledgeable about same-sex sexual health and shared their life experiences at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation. The cervical cancer screening experiences of black LBQ women would be improved by training all health care providers in same-sex sexual health, offering opportunities for clinicians to learn about the effects of various forms of discrimination on women's health care, and increasing the presence of LBQ women of color in health care settings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Social Sciences 32 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Psychology 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,983,023
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Women &amp; Health
#62
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,315
of 308,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women &amp; Health
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.