↓ Skip to main content

Creativity and bipolar disorder: Touched by fire or burning with questions?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
17 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Creativity and bipolar disorder: Touched by fire or burning with questions?
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Substantial literature has linked bipolar disorder with creative accomplishment. Much of the thinking in this area has been inspired by biographical accounts of poets, musicians, and other highly accomplished groups, which frequently document signs of bipolar disorder in these samples. A smaller literature has examined quantitative measures of creativity among people with bipolar disorder or at risk for the disorder. In this paper, we provide a critical review of such evidence. We then consider putative mechanisms related to the link of bipolar disorder with creativity, by drawing on literature outside of bipolar disorder on personality, motivational, and affective predictors of creativity. Because so little research has directly evaluated whether these factors could help explain the elevations of creativity in bipolar disorder, we conclude with an agenda for future research on the theoretically and clinically compelling topic of creativity in bipolar disorder.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
Australia 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 316 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 17%
Student > Master 45 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 10%
Researcher 32 10%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 73 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 141 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 10%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 49 15%
Unknown 78 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 158. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2026.
All research outputs
#325,521
of 34,351,437 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#84
of 1,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,112
of 188,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,351,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.