↓ Skip to main content

Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy after Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurotrauma, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy after Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Journal of Neurotrauma, October 2015
DOI 10.1089/neu.2014.3694
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) and the ubiquitin-proteasomal system (UPS) are two major protein degradation systems responsible for maintaining cellular homeostasis, but how these two systems are regulated after traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains unknown. TBI produces primary mechanical damage that must be repaired to maintain neuronal homeostasis. The level of lysosomal-associated membrane protein type 2A (LAMP2A) is the hallmark of CMA activity. The level of polyubiquitinated proteins (ubi-proteins) reflects UPS activity. This study utilized a moderate fluid percussion injury model in rats to investigate the changes in CMA and the UPS after TBI. Induction of CMA was manifested by significant upregulation of LAMP2A and secondary lysosomes during the periods of 1-15 days of recovery after TBI. In comparison, the levels of ubi-proteins were increased only moderately after TBI. The increases in the levels of LAMP2A and HSP70 for CMA after TBI were seen mainly in the secondary lysosome-containing fractions. Confocal and electron microscopy further showed that increased LAMP2A or lysosomes were found mainly in neurons and proliferated microglia. Because CMA and the UPS are two major routes for elimination of different types of cellular aberrant proteins, the consecutive activation of these two pathways may serve as a protective mechanism for maintaining cellular homeostasis after TBI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Neuroscience 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#29,079,509
of 32,151,140 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurotrauma
#2,950
of 3,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,985
of 302,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurotrauma
#45
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,151,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.