↓ Skip to main content

A Potent and Broad Neutralizing Antibody Recognizes and Penetrates the HIV Glycan Shield

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Potent and Broad Neutralizing Antibody Recognizes and Penetrates the HIV Glycan Shield
Published in
Science, October 2011
DOI 10.1126/science.1213256
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The HIV envelope (Env) protein gp120 is protected from antibody recognition by a dense glycan shield. However, several of the recently identified PGT broadly neutralizing antibodies appear to interact directly with the HIV glycan coat. Crystal structures of antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) PGT 127 and 128 with Man(9) at 1.65 and 1.29 angstrom resolution, respectively, and glycan binding data delineate a specific high mannose-binding site. Fab PGT 128 complexed with a fully glycosylated gp120 outer domain at 3.25 angstroms reveals that the antibody penetrates the glycan shield and recognizes two conserved glycans as well as a short β-strand segment of the gp120 V3 loop, accounting for its high binding affinity and broad specificity. Furthermore, our data suggest that the high neutralization potency of PGT 127 and 128 immunoglobulin Gs may be mediated by cross-linking Env trimers on the viral surface.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
South Africa 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 365 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 24%
Researcher 85 22%
Student > Master 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 67 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 32 8%
Chemistry 31 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 6%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 61 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2025.
All research outputs
#1,039,770
of 32,823,751 outputs
Outputs from Science
#19,112
of 92,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,826
of 179,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#110
of 648 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,823,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 648 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.