The UPICT FDG PET-CT Protocol is intended to guide the performance of whole-body FDG-PET/CT studies within the context of single- and multi-center clinical trials of oncologic therapies by providing acceptable (minimum), target, and ideal standards for all phases of the imaging. The aim is to minimize intra- and inter-subject, intra- and inter-platform, inter-examination, and inter-institutional variability of primary and/or derived data. The goal of this condensed version of the much larger document is to make readers aware of the general content and subject area. The full document is available on line. The main subjects areas in the document are: Context of the imaging protocol within the clinical trial, Site selection, Qualification and training, Subject scheduling, Subject preparation, Imaging related substance preparation and administration, Imaging procedure, Image post-processing, Image analysis, Image interpretation, Archival and distribution of data, Quality control, and Imaging-associated risks and risk management.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,243,793
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#2,625
of 8,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,997
of 287,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#25
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
