↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Triple-Antiretroviral Prophylaxis to Prevent Mother-To-Child HIV Transmission through Breastfeeding—The Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya: A Clinical Trial
Published in
PLOS Medicine, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Effective strategies are needed for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT) in resource-limited settings. The Kisumu Breastfeeding Study was a single-arm open label trial conducted between July 2003 and February 2009. The overall aim was to investigate whether a maternal triple-antiretroviral regimen that was designed to maximally suppress viral load in late pregnancy and the first 6 mo of lactation was a safe, well-tolerated, and effective PMTCT intervention.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 299 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 22%
Researcher 41 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 26 8%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 66 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 11%
Social Sciences 29 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 7%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 73 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2025.
All research outputs
#2,890,739
of 34,675,792 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#2,801
of 5,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,922
of 163,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,675,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 81.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.