↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Expression of adipocyte/macrophage fatty acid binding protein in tumor associated macrophages promotes breast cancer progression
Published in
Cancer Research, April 2018
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-2465
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tumor associated macrophages (TAM) play a critical role in cancer development and progression. However, the heterogeneity of TAM presents a major challenge to identify clinically-relevant markers for pro-tumor TAM. Here, we report that expression of adipocyte/macrophage fatty acid binding protein (A-FABP) in TAM promotes breast cancer progression. While upregulation of A-FABP was inversely associated with breast cancer survival, deficiency of A-FABP significantly reduced mammary tumor growth and metastasis. Furthermore, the pro-tumor effect of A-FABP was mediated by TAM, in particular in a subset of TAM with a CD11b+F4/80+MHCII-Ly6C- phenotype. A-FABP expression in TAM facilitated pro-tumor IL-6/STAT3 signaling through regulation of NFκB/miR-29b pathway. Collectively, our results suggest A-FABP as a new functional marker for pro-tumor TAM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 43 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 47 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#12,327,560
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#19,164
of 35,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,923
of 370,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#84
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.