↓ Skip to main content

V-Y island flaps for repair of large perianal defects

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Surgery, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
V-Y island flaps for repair of large perianal defects
Published in
American Journal of Surgery, April 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00578-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Some perianal diseases such as Paget disease and Bowen disease are extensive and require a wide circumferential excision including the entire anoderm of the anal canal. We describe a technique of V-Y island flaps to cover the large perianal defects and the denuded anal canal. It is important to excise the base of the flaps in order to fit them into the anal canal. There were 10 women and 5 men with an average age of 54 years (range 32 to 77). The mean follow-up was 45 months (range 6 to 92). The underlying pathology included various kinds of neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases. There were no major complications such as flap loss or infection. Most complications were minor, including superficial wound separation, flap hematoma, and anal stricture. Although initially all patients had some degree of incontinence for gas and liquid stool or discharge, none of them had significant fecal incontinence at the time of last follow-up. A diverting ileostomy or colostomy was created in 5 patients. Its role was not clear but it did help in the management of the wounds and minimized the pain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Denmark 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 27%
Student > Master 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2015.
All research outputs
#31,227,209
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Surgery
#7,001
of 7,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,670
of 63,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Surgery
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.