↓ Skip to main content

Resource recovery from wastewater: application of meta-omics to phosphorus and carbon management

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Biotechnology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Resource recovery from wastewater: application of meta-omics to phosphorus and carbon management
Published in
Current Opinion in Biotechnology, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.03.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A growing trend at wastewater treatment plants is the recovery of resources and energy from wastewater. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal and anaerobic digestion are two established biotechnology approaches for the recovery of phosphorus and carbon, respectively. Meta-omics approaches (meta-genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) are providing novel biological insights into these complex biological systems. In particular, genome-centric metagenomics analyses are revealing the function and physiology of individual community members. Querying transcripts, proteins and metabolites are emerging techniques that can inform the cellular responses under different conditions. Overall, meta-omics approaches are shedding light into complex microbial communities once regarded as 'blackboxes', but challenges remain to integrate information from meta-omics into engineering design and operation guidelines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 101 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Master 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 15%
Engineering 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Chemical Engineering 6 5%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#1,508
of 2,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,979
of 278,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Biotechnology
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.