↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles and the Risk of Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Implications for Risk Prediction
Published in
Cancer Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-1907
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonis C. Antoniou, Jonathan Beesley, Lesley McGuffog, Olga M. Sinilnikova, Sue Healey, Susan L. Neuhausen, Yuan Chun Ding, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Henry T. Lynch, Claudine Isaacs, Patricia A. Ganz, Gail Tomlinson, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Fergus J. Couch, Xianshu Wang, Noralane M. Lindor, Vernon S. Pankratz, Paolo Radice, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Daniela Zaffaroni, Monica Barile, Alessandra Viel, Anna Allavena, Valentina Dall'Olio, Paolo Peterlongo, Csilla I. Szabo, Michal Zikan, Kathleen Claes, Bruce Poppe, Lenka Foretova, Phuong L. Mai, Mark H. Greene, Gad Rennert, Flavio Lejbkowicz, Gord Glendon, Hilmi Ozcelik, Irene L. Andrulis, Mads Thomassen, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Lone Sunde, Dorthe Cruger, Uffe Birk Jensen, Maria Caligo, Eitan Friedman, Bella Kaufman, Yael Laitman, Roni Milgrom, Maya Dubrovsky, Shimrit Cohen, Ake Borg, Helena Jernström, Annika Lindblom, Johanna Rantala, Marie Stenmark-Askmalm, Beatrice Melin, Kate Nathanson, Susan Domchek, Ania Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Tomasz Huzarski, Ana Osorio, Adriana Lasa, Mercedes Durán, Maria-Isabel Tejada, Javier Godino, Javier Benitez, Ute Hamann, Mieke Kriege, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge, Rob B. van der Luijt, Christi J. van Asperen, Peter Devilee, E.J. Meijers-Heijboer, Marinus J. Blok, Cora M. Aalfs, Frans Hogervorst, Matti Rookus, Margaret Cook, Clare Oliver, Debra Frost, Don Conroy, D. Gareth Evans, Fiona Lalloo, Gabriella Pichert, Rosemarie Davidson, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Joan Paterson, Shirley Hodgson, Patrick J. Morrison, Mary E. Porteous, Lisa Walker, M. John Kennedy, Huw Dorkins, Susan Peock, Andrew K. Godwin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Antoine de Pauw, Sylvie Mazoyer, Valérie Bonadona, Christine Lasset, Hélène Dreyfus, Dominique Leroux, Agnès Hardouin, Pascaline Berthet, Laurence Faivre, Catherine Loustalot, Tetsuro Noguchi, Hagay Sobol, Etienne Rouleau, Catherine Nogues, Marc Frénay, Laurence Vénat-Bouvet, John L. Hopper, Mary B. Daly, Mary B. Terry, Esther M. John, Saundra S. Buys, Yosuf Yassin, Alexander Miron, David Goldgar, Christian F. Singer, Anne Catharina Dressler, Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich, Georg Pfeiler, Thomas V.O. Hansen, Lars Jønson, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Tomas Kirchhoff, Kenneth Offit, Vincent Devlin, Ana Dutra-Clarke, Marion Piedmonte, Gustavo C. Rodriguez, Katie Wakeley, John F. Boggess, Jack Basil, Peter E. Schwartz, Stephanie V. Blank, Amanda Ewart Toland, Marco Montagna, Cinzia Casella, Evgeny Imyanitov, Laima Tihomirova, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lazaro, Susan J. Ramus, Lara Sucheston, Beth Y. Karlan, Jenny Gross, Rita Schmutzler, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, Magdalena Lochmann, Norbert Arnold, Simone Heidemann, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva, Dieter Niederacher, Christian Sutter, Helmut Deissler, Dorothea Gadzicki, Sabine Preisler-Adams, Karin Kast, Ines Schönbuchner, Trinidad Caldes, Miguel de la Hoya, Kristiina Aittomäki, Heli Nevanlinna, Jacques Simard, Amanda B. Spurdle, Helene Holland, Xiaoqing Chen, Radka Platte, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Douglas F. Easton

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Student > Master 18 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 37 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 17%
Engineering 4 2%
Mathematics 4 2%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 37 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2026.
All research outputs
#3,007,416
of 29,056,360 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#2,220
of 21,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,788
of 210,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#20
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,056,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.