↓ Skip to main content

The Process of Curriculum Development and Implementation for an Adolescent Health Project in Middle Schools

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of School Nursing, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Process of Curriculum Development and Implementation for an Adolescent Health Project in Middle Schools
Published in
The Journal of School Nursing, October 2011
DOI 10.1177/1059840511424414
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Childhood obesity has reached epidemic levels in developed countries and is showing no signs of abating. The causes of obesity in adolescence are extremely complex, and therefore approaches to prevention and treatments must be multifaceted. Early adolescence is a developmental period when youth are becoming more independent, are influenced by peers, and are making more decisions related to their own health and lifestyles. The purpose of this article is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a multilevel school-based intervention program for middle school students in the Teen Eating and Activity Mentoring in Schools (TEAMS) project. Critical components of success included an interdisciplinary approach, applying available curricula to meet contextual characteristics, and involvement of all stakeholders in planning, evaluating, and refining the program.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Social Sciences 16 16%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 29 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2012.
All research outputs
#24,411,485
of 29,672,131 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of School Nursing
#605
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,972
of 161,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of School Nursing
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,672,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.