Comparison of Calorie and Protein Intake of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Receiving Mother's Own Milk or Donor Milk When the Nutrient Composition of Human Milk Is Measured With a Breast Milk Analyzer
In premature infants, donor breast milk (DBM) is assumed to provide reduced nutrients vs. mother's own milk (MOM). This study examined calorie and protein delivery when very low birth weight infants were fed fortified MOM or DBM, with a known nutrient composition, relative to established nutrition recommendations and to determine if there were differences between the groups.
A retrospective medical record review was conducted in 29 very low birth weight infants receiving MOM or DBM. Nutrient content of human milk was measured using the Calais Analyzer. Added fortifiers feeding volume, and weight were collected to determine total daily calorie and protein intake.
145 days of enteral feedings among 29 infants were included, 78 (53.8%) from DBM and 67 (46.2%) from MOM. Mean daily fluid intake among infants receiving DBM was significantly higher when compared with MOM, 150.6 ± 7.6 mL/kg vs 146.8 ± 11.3 mL/kg (P = .016). DBM feedings provided 110.1 ± 9.0 kcals/kg/d vs 113.0 ± 21.0 kcals/kg/d from MOM feedings (P = .275). Mean protein intake was similar, 4.1 ± 0.5 g /kg/d on DBM days vs 4.0 ± 0.5 g kg/d on MOM days (P = .162). A total of 46 of 78 DBM days (59.0%) and 30 of 67 MOM days (44.8%) were below the minimum established calorie needs of 110 kcals/kg/day.
DBM provides comparable nutrient intake to MOM at a higher enteral feeding volume. However, both types of human milk failed to meet energy needs with standard fortification regimens.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,921,572
of 24,458,924 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition in Clinical Practice
#1,377
of 1,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,124
of 333,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition in Clinical Practice
#31
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,458,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
