↓ Skip to main content

Optical imaging techniques for the study of malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biotechnology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optical imaging techniques for the study of malaria
Published in
Trends in Biotechnology, September 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.08.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Malarial infection needs to be imaged to reveal the mechanisms behind malaria pathophysiology and to provide insights to aid in the diagnosis of the disease. Recent advances in optical imaging methods are now being transferred from physics laboratories to the biological field, revolutionizing how we study malaria. To provide insight into how these imaging techniques can improve the study and treatment of malaria, we summarize recent progress on optical imaging techniques, ranging from in vitro visualization of the disease progression of malaria infected red blood cells (iRBCs) to in vivo imaging of malaria parasites in the liver.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 156 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 19%
Engineering 24 15%
Physics and Astronomy 19 12%
Chemistry 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,223,327
of 27,449,530 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biotechnology
#1,049
of 2,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,585
of 148,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biotechnology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,449,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.