↓ Skip to main content

Maximizing Cellular Adaptation to Endurance Exercise in Skeletal Muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
271 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
698 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maximizing Cellular Adaptation to Endurance Exercise in Skeletal Muscle
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), May 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The application of molecular techniques to exercise biology has provided novel insight into the complexity and breadth of intracellular signaling networks involved in response to endurance-based exercise. Here we discuss several strategies that have high uptake by athletes and, on mechanistic grounds, have the potential to promote cellular adaptation to endurance training in skeletal muscle. Such approaches are based on the underlying premise that imposing a greater metabolic load and provoking extreme perturbations in cellular homeostasis will augment acute exercise responses that, when repeated over months and years, will amplify training adaptation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 698 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 698 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 15%
Student > Bachelor 92 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 9%
Researcher 52 7%
Other 34 5%
Other 119 17%
Unknown 233 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 175 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 4%
Other 63 9%
Unknown 256 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#290,180
of 34,626,533 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#321
of 3,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,163
of 371,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#15
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,626,533 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.