↓ Skip to main content

Management of acute cardiac failure with mechanical assist: experience with the ABIOMED BVS 5000

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Management of acute cardiac failure with mechanical assist: experience with the ABIOMED BVS 5000
Published in
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, March 2001
DOI 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02644-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Chile 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Researcher 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 17%
Other 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Engineering 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,019,860
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#2,434
of 11,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,372
of 57,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
#14
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.