You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modeling the hydrogen sulfide binding to heme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2018.04.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B.D. Ostojić, P. Schwerdtfeger, D.S. Đorđević |
| Abstract |
The binding of hydrogen sulfide to a model heme compound is investigated by coupled-cluster singles-doubles augmented by a perturbative triple excitations, CCSD(T), and density functional theory, DFT. The minimum energy path for the H2S addition to an isolated heme center of the heme protein is evaluated by adopting as a model the heme compound FeP(Im) (P = porphyrin; Im = imidazole). The FeP(Im)-H2S aduct is bound by 13.7 kcal/mol at the CCSD(T) level of theory. Relaxed potential energy curves for the lowest lying spin states of the H2S to FeP(Im) binding using DFT reveal that the binding process is associated with a "double spin-crossover" reaction with the existence of long-distance van der Waals minima only 5-7 kcal/mol above the FeP(Im)-H2S ground state. The fact that the energy of the singlet ground state of FeP(Im)-H2S is so close in energy to the dissociation products FeP(Im) + H2S points towards the reversibility of the H2S adsorption/desorption process in biochemical reactions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 30% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 4 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
#1,480
of 1,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,846
of 340,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.