↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interleukin-1β is associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with mTOR-inhibitor-eluting stent implantation
Published in
Heart and Vessels, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00380-017-0947-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Implantation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-inhibitor drug-eluting stents (DESs) impairs coronary endothelial function. There are no known non-invasive biomarkers of coronary endothelial dysfunction. We aimed to assess the association between serum interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and coronary endothelial dysfunction in patients with mTOR-inhibitor DES implantation and to investigate the association between the mTOR pathway and IL-1β. We enrolled 35 patients who had implanted DESs for coronary artery disease. At a 10-month follow-up, peripheral venous blood samples were collected to measure IL-1β levels. Coronary endothelial dysfunction was evaluated by intracoronary infusion of incremental doses of acetylcholine. Serum IL-1β levels were significantly associated with the magnitude of vasoconstriction to acetylcholine at the segment distal (P < 0.05) but not proximal to the stent. Serum IL-1β levels were positively correlated with stent length (P < 0.05). To examine the direct effects of mTOR inhibition on IL-1β release, sirolimus was incubated in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) or coronary artery smooth muscle cells (CASMCs). Sirolimus directly increased IL-1β mRNA expression (P < 0.01) and enhanced IL-1β release into the culture media (P < 0.01) in CASMCs, but not in HUVECs. Inhibition of mTOR triggers IL-1β release through transcriptional activation in CASMCs. Serum IL-1β levels are a potential biomarker for mTOR-inhibitor DES-associated coronary endothelial dysfunction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Lecturer 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Heart and Vessels
#412
of 693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,844
of 422,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart and Vessels
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.