You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Taxonomic Considerations in Listing Subspecies Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, August 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00530.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
SUSAN M. HAIG, ERIK A. BEEVER, STEVEN M. CHAMBERS, HOPE M. DRAHEIM, BRUCE D. DUGGER, SUSIE DUNHAM, ELISE ELLIOTT‐SMITH, JOSEPH B. FONTAINE, DYLAN C. KESLER, BRIAN J. KNAUS, IARA F. LOPES, PETE LOSCHL, THOMAS D. MULLINS, LISA M. SHEFFIELD |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 323 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 5% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Professor | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 65 | 20% |
| Unknown | 33 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 213 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 1% |
| Philosophy | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 2% |
| Unknown | 39 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,108,013
of 25,371,292 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,514
of 4,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,136
of 82,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.