↓ Skip to main content

DrugPred: A Structure-Based Approach To Predict Protein Druggability Developed Using an Extensive Nonredundant Data Set

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DrugPred: A Structure-Based Approach To Predict Protein Druggability Developed Using an Extensive Nonredundant Data Set
Published in
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, October 2011
DOI 10.1021/ci200266d
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Judging if a protein is able to bind orally available molecules with high affinity, i.e. if a protein is druggable, is an important step in target assessment. In order to derive a structure-based method to predict protein druggability, a comprehensive, nonredundant data set containing crystal structures of 71 druggable and 44 less druggable proteins was compiled by literature search and data mining. This data set was subsequently used to train a structure-based druggability predictor (DrugPred) using partial least-squares projection to latent structures discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). DrugPred performed well in discriminating druggable from less druggable binding sites for both internal and external predictions. The method is robust against conformational changes in the binding site and outperforms previously published methods. The superior performance of DrugPred is likely due to the size and composition of the training set which, in contrast to most previously developed methods, only contains cavities that have evolved to bind a natural ligand.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Russia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 125 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 22%
Researcher 31 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 43 31%
Computer Science 18 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 29 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#18,209,019
of 28,330,556 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
#5,113
of 6,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,362
of 157,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,330,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.