↓ Skip to main content

CRB1 mutations may result in retinitis pigmentosa without para-arteriolar RPE preservation

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmic Genetics, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 634)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CRB1 mutations may result in retinitis pigmentosa without para-arteriolar RPE preservation
Published in
Ophthalmic Genetics, July 2009
DOI 10.1076/opge.22.3.163.2222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Lotery, Aslam Malik, S.A. Shami, Mehtab Sindhi, Bashir Chohan, Maqbool, Paula A. Moore, Michael J. Denton, Edwin M. Stone

Abstract

To report a new phenotype in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients with CRB1 mutations at the RP12 locus. Thirty-seven patients from two Pakistani families with severe retinitis pigmentosa. Samples were screened with single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis followed by DNA sequencing of the coding sequence of the CRB1 gene. Two novel CRB1 mutations were discovered. No patients had evidence of preservation of the para-arteriolar retinal pigment epithelium (PPRPE) that has been previously reported in all cases of RP associated with CRB1 mutations. Patients with severe autosomal recessive (or simplex) RP who lack the finding of PPRPE should not be excluded from molecular analysis of CRB1 purely because they lack the clinical feature of PPRPE. This report illustrates that RP at the RP12 locus is not clinically uniform. The absence of PPRPE cannot be used to exclude CRB1 as a potential molecular explanation for RP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 4 24%
Professor 3 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,056,682
of 34,054,827 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmic Genetics
#14
of 634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,647
of 171,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmic Genetics
#3
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,054,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 634 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.