↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 5,915)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
171 X users
facebook
140 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
443 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevalence of gluteus medius weakness in people with chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-4027-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas A. Cooper, Kelsey M. Scavo, Kyle J. Strickland, Natti Tipayamongkol, Jeffrey D. Nicholson, Dennis C. Bewyer, Kathleen A. Sluka

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 171 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 439 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 16%
Student > Master 72 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 7%
Researcher 26 6%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 130 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 99 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 90 20%
Sports and Recreations 65 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 30 7%
Unknown 146 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#184,593
of 34,377,743 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#10
of 5,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,580
of 307,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,377,743 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,915 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.